The World Civilizations Library Assignment: Development and Analysis
History and Structure of World Civilizations at WSU
In 1986 a faculty group at Washington State University (WSU) embarked on
a project that resulted in a new requirement for all prospective graduates
of the university, a two-semester sequence in World Civilizations (Gen Ed
110 and 111), chronologically divided at 1500 ce. Initial course design
was funded by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities, and
the classes soon became a part of the general education curricular mainstream,
normally taken at the freshman level. From the outset, library faculty were
included in the development of the course. Library skills are mentioned
in the program's Rationale1 and a library assignment
is required by the Covenant of Course Objectives and Coverage for World
Civilizations 110-111 which states, "To teach basic information retrieval
and library research skills-[all sections of Gen Ed 110 will] have a graded
library assignment."2 Two guides, Educational
Objectives in Library Use for Students in World Civilizations Classes3 and Creating Effective Library
Assignments,4 are available for consideration by World Civilizations
faculty as they develop the library assignment for their classes, as is
individual collaboration with librarians. During the 2003/2004 and present
academic years, World Civ administrators and teaching instructors have been
working on revising the program's overarching learning outcomes, including
the outcome corresponding to the library assignment.
The co-authors of this article are librarians at
WSU who have also taught world history courses at the high school (Johnson)
and university (Spitzer) levels. Our purpose in writing this article is
to help other instructors strengthen the link between the history classroom
and the library, through examination of WSU's World Civilizations library
assignment. World history textbooks are necessarily surveys, without room
to examine every topic in detail. Library assignments give students the
opportunity to learn a subject in greater depth and, by reading multiple
sources, understand that historical accounts and analysis often differ in
interpretation. As instructors we hope to inspire students and provide them
with a base from which they can pursue their own interests through individual
research. Library skills can be transferred from one library to another
(e.g., high school to college) and can provide students with the self-sufficiency
and confidence necessary for lifelong learning. Libraries and world history
courses share the same goal of preserving and chronicling the past.
Goals and Objectives of the Library Assignment
During the 2004 spring semester, in his role as World Civilizations library
liaison, Corey Johnson visited thirty of the thirty-four World Civilizations
instructors to learn more about their library assignments. The contents
of the discussions included a conversation about the structure of the professor's
library assignment, both past and present iterations, and information about
goals and objectives for the assignment. Copies of the assignments were
requested, and twenty-four were collected. They were analyzed with a focus
on connections to the overarching World Civilizations' mandates, information
they provided about the libraries, numbers and types of sources required
for assignment completion, and how they addressed issues such as citation
formats and plagiarism.
|We soon realized that our interpretation of the library assignment course objective, "To teach basic information retrieval and library research skills," was different than that of the World Civilizations instructors. To librarians, basic information retrieval skills consist of areas such as developing search queries with Boolean logic, knowing the difference between keyword and subject searching, and reading a call number (skills we find only partly developed among most students). While many of the World Civilizations assignments ask students to accomplish tasks where they must utilize some of these skills (e.g., finding a book on their topic), few explicitly provide instruction or written explanation concerning these skills.||4|
If, on the whole, instructors are not incorporating
a librarian's interpretation of the objective expressed in the covenant,
then what are their learning objectives? Almost all instructors say that
their primary goal is simply to get students into the library. This is a
commendable aim as it recognizes the pre-requisite nature of this goal in
relation to most others and it acknowledges the typical first year college
students' aversion toward the library. Even students taking the online sections
of the course are required to visit a local public or academic library,
or order materials through a library borrowing program. Instructors understand
that very few historical encyclopedias or books are available online. One
of the assignments addresses in writing the idea that a college library
is a complex learning environment that demands more sophisticated skills
than they may have used at libraries in the past.
Beyond getting students into the library, there
are a host of other objectives that are common to a number of the library
assignments. Some emphasize getting students to begin developing their own
research styles, a gentle introduction to life-long learning. They want
students to become familiar with the academic research process. One instructor
helps students get comfortable with the research process by having the graduate
teaching assistant for the class talk about his/her own research experiences.
Some instructors want students to learn that they
can always know more about any specific area of history, since survey textbooks
normally only provide an introduction. They may ask them to focus in depth
on a particular topic from the past and, in many cases, to draw connections
between the past and the present, perhaps utilizing newspapers or journal
articles which discuss recent world events. Others want students to recognize
the diversity of resources available in the library, including various formats
(e.g., books, microforms, specialized encyclopedias, online journals), and
may ask them to compare the information found based on differences in format.
Beyond media format issues, students are also often required to evaluate
the quality of a particular resource as compared to other sources, in light
of a developed research question, and in a few instances, in relation to
a provided set of assessment criteria. All of these objectives could provide
a strong foundation for assignment development at the secondary and post-secondary
Many World Civilizations instructors started out assigning a traditional
library research paper, but have moved away from this mainly because of
plagiarism; there are too many 'papers for sale' on the Web. In addition,
class sizes have grown significantly over the years, decreasing the feasibility
of assigning and grading long research papers. Assignments now tend to be
shorter and less complex, broken up into parts with some type of evaluation
or check at each step, or with a form to be filled out that provides structure
and guidance. Such a form might ask for things like paper topic, research
question, working thesis statement, and works cited entries. The end product
for many of the assignments is some kind of annotated bibliography, which
is a skill that is useful for later history classes.
Students are generally able to select their own
topics, but often within certain constraints such as using the index to
the textbook while picking a proper noun starting with the same letter as
their last name, choosing from a vetted list of topics (first come/first
served), or selecting from a pile of postcards or online database images.
These constraints help combat plagiarism, while still providing students
a sense of choice and ensuring selection of topically appropriate subjects.
It is interesting to note however that there are also many instructors who
have their students select any topic they desire, hoping they choose subjects
of personal interest or subjects corresponding to their major. Is an instructor
more successful restricting choice or being more open to student preferences?
Several instructors noted that because students typically have difficulties
with research topic selection and refinement, it is better to utilize a
prescribed topic pool, regardless of the plagiarism considerations.
There is some tendency toward having students do
more creative writing such as an interview with a famous historical person,
a news story, or a diary entry taking on a particular cultural/historical
persona (e.g., Chinese daughter-in-law, Mayan priest, medieval European
midwife, traditional West African griot). Students often report that this
type of assignment makes history 'come alive' for them, and helps them realize
that history involves real people and not just words on the pages of a book.
One instructor has students collect information on a topic and prepare a
lesson plan as if they were going to teach the class. These creative approaches
reduce the opportunity for plagiarism, or at least the kind of academic
dishonesty where one purchases or copies significant portions of a term
paper. Instructors also report that it is more enjoyable for them to read
(and probably more fun for the students to write).
Another approach asks for individual reaction to
the contents of the resources discovered or to the research process itself.
The idea here is to have the students place the topic in personal context
and achieve higher order thinking (a current goal of most educational institutions)
by asking them to assess the value of resources and the success of the information
retrieval process itself. Also, students are arguably less likely to plagiarize
this kind of writing. But again, as in the case of the other assignment
structure trends, there are teachers whose curricular choices reflect a
polar opposite opinion. Two instructors feel there is too much emphasis
in education on students expressing their personal views, and that they
rarely support these views with structured arguments and evidence. Part
of the problem may be that none of the assignments connects creative writing
or personal reactions with a citation requirement. An obligation to include
citations would create a focus on utilization of evidence.
There are many other specific assignment components
teachers use to confront plagiarism. Some instructors have students turn
in photocopies of Website home pages and book title pages, and require students
to be prepared to hand in their notes, outlines, and early drafts of the
written piece in case there are questions about the research and writing
of the paper. Some require a listing of the works consulted, and randomly
check citations and bibliographies for accuracy. Others fight plagiarism
by giving assignments where students must connect very current news events
with those of the past so that topics change each semester. Overall, the
trend could not be mistaken: the threat of academic dishonesty has shaped
the evolution of the World Civilizations library assignment at WSU, just
as it has shaped the nature of assignments at academic institutions across
the United States.
A small proportion of the World Civilizations library
assignments include information about how the assignment will be graded.
There are assignments which include a checklist for students to consult
so they remember to submit all of the components of the assignment in the
prescribed way the instructor requires, e.g., "Do you have an approved topic,
title sheet, two Web sources and three academic printed sources and printouts
from your Web pages?" Instructors also sometimes include an evaluation rubric
with their assignment documentation. Nearly all of these rubrics are variations
on the Critical Thinking Rubric5 developed by WSU's Center
for Teaching, Learning, and Technology.6 The Critical Thinking
Rubric features assessment in seven areas measuring how well the student:
* summarizes the problem/question at issue
* presents the student's own perspective and position
* considers other salient perspectives and positions
* assesses the key assumptions
* assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence
* considers the influence of context on the issue
* and assesses conclusions, implications and consequences.
Although most library research assignments written at any academic level could benefit from the addition of a checklist or rubric, for the growing number of fill-in-the-blank type assignments, the way the instructor will evaluate the assignment is quite clear.
Selecting Information Resources
The use of specialized encyclopedias and books underlies most WSU World
Civilizations library research assignments. The instructors agree that,
unlike the open Web resources to which young adults gravitate, these peer-reviewed
resources are the key to quality research projects. Librarians created a
handout of relevant reference titles, World Civilizations: Selected Encyclopedias
in Holland Library,7 which gives students
a place to begin their research and forces them to put their topic in a
broader context (e.g., time period, country or part of the world, discipline
such as art, religion, or politics). Copies are available at the library's
reference desk, and in some faculty members' course packets or online syllabi.
A list of introductory reference materials included with an assignment sheet
is a great way to start students of any age on research projects.
By examining the set of collected library assignments,
we discovered that fifteen of the twenty-four assignments collected asked
students to utilize encyclopedias. The interviews, however, uncovered differences
in opinion about their value as a scholarly resource. While nearly all instructors
forbid their students from using general encyclopedias as a cited source,
there are some who see specialized encyclopedias in the same light as general
encyclopedias, i.e., as not appropriate for college level research. For
them, the use of specialized encyclopedias is at best a launching point
in the research process, with the gathering of monographs being a far more
important process. The lesson for instructors is to be clear about the kinds
of resources they feel are appropriate for research at a given academic
A few teachers require students to locate journal
articles on their topic, although it can be very difficult to find articles
on pre-1500 topics, and students become frustrated with this part of their
assignment. Even when they can find articles, the content is often too sophisticated
for the students to comprehend. In recent years, access to full-text online
articles has become possible through services such as ProjectMuse
and JSTOR. This development is especially helpful to online classes.
Assignments which ask students to draw comparisons between the past and
present often require students to utilize newspapers and/or magazines in
the library's microfilm or online collection. In addition, a few instructors
want students to examine primary source documents, either in reprint form,
or originals from the library's Manuscripts, Archives and Special Collections
could also encourage their students to visit local historical societies
and museums, or suggest online collections of primary source documents.
|Over the years, more instructors have included Websites as an acceptable information resource, but there is still much controversy over the use of Web resources among the World Civilizations instructors. Of the twenty-four assignments gathered, five directly require students to use Web materials and three offer students the opportunity to use Websites to augment the mandated list of resource types. One assignment asks students to analyze the quality of a Website they have selected by using information presented in books as the standard. On the other hand, three of the sixteen projects that prohibit the use of Websites explain that Web resources are largely of low quality. They declare that Web sources are not an acceptable replacement for peer-reviewed, published texts and refuse to accept them as resources for the library assignment.||17|
But what do the instructors mean by Websites, the
Internet, or electronic resources? A number of the assignments ask students
to select Internet resources, but what are Internet resources? The challenge
is helping students understand the difference between online library resources
like e-books and full-text article indexes (which are the online equivalent
of professional, scholarly, peer-reviewed publications), as compared to
open Web sources. All of these resource types are on the Internet and an
increasing amount of the total resource base at academic and school libraries
is available via the Internet. Although one does not need to come through
the library door to get access to the library's electronic resources, one
does need to link through a library gateway or home page. This distinguishes
the library's electronic or Internet resources from the open Web sources
one finds primarily by using a search engine such as Google. High school
and post-secondary teachers need to explain these important differences
to their students. In the World Civilizations program, there is only a small
amount of explanation evident in the written documentation of the library
assignments. Overall, there are diverse and even dichotomous views about
the use of Websites in student research. It will be interesting to see if
the future produces an atmosphere of greater or lesser acceptance of Websites
for student research assignments.
All of the library assignments for this project address citation issues.
However, there are vast differences. There are many assignments that require
students to fill in blanks on a standardized form. These assignments primarily
ask students to enter citation elements for the resources they gather (e.g.,
author, title). The strength of this type of assignment is that the distinct
elements that make up a citation are recognized. The weakness is that students
learn nothing about the part of the research process that requires them
to create in-text citations and summary bibliographies. Many of the library
assignments with a creative writing focus are similar to the standardized
form assignments in that they do not require students to cite their sources.
|There are a host of assignments where instructors provide their own citation style for students to follow. Some show only examples of in-text citations while omitting bibliography examples; others do the opposite. Also, within the group of assignments featuring only in-text citation examples, there are some that provide only examples of paraphrasing and some that provide only examples of quotation. Another common assignment documentation scenario is to have citation examples for only some of the resource types used. For example, the students may be asked to examine two reference works, two books, and two journal articles, but the assignment sheet only provides examples of how to cite books. The advantage of all these kinds of assignments is that the instructor provides some citation examples students can follow. The disadvantages are that learning a unique citation format for one class does not help students in the larger context, and when they have only partial exposure to the many possible kinds of citations (e.g., only in-text quotations, or bibliographic citation format for books), they are bound to miss situations where they should be providing a citation.||20|
|Finally, there are two other ways that citation is addressed in the library assignments. The first is an assignment where students are asked to cite their sources but are given no written guidance about how to do it. The second is an assignment in which students are asked to incorporate a standard citation style such as MLA or APA. The former approach is limited because students are left to figure out what kind of citation parameters the instructor wants. The latter type works well because the students are given the name of the style guide so they can equip themselves to handle any and all citation needs. The drawback is that by requiring the students to accurately use a standard citation guide, students need to concentrate on citation at the expense of other research and writing components. On the other hand, when students are only given a fraction of the total information they need to successfully cite their sources in the academic world, this can be just as problematic. Regardless of the citation structure an instructor utilizes, all teachers need to be sure they are providing accurate and adequate citation information on their assignment sheets and in their verbal instructions. It is also important to discuss citation requirements with teaching colleagues. As much as possible, instructors should aim for consistency within academic programs when it comes to citation standards. This helps students recognize the united front educators share about the vital practice of citing sources.||21|
|Beyond the scope of the library assignment is the issue of what kinds of writing should require the use of citations. We teach that one should cite their sources any time they borrow another's idea, but does this apply to all creative writing, test writing, annotated bibliographies and other essay writing students might do? One instructor's library assignment says that if students write their library assignment like their examinations, they do not need to cite. Does this approach make sense? Also, what role should citation play in an introductory level course versus an advanced course? Again, educators within departments, schools and institutions need to collaborate and present consistent messages about when to cite in their academic work.||22|
Exploring Research Questions vs. Evaluation of Resources
|In May 2004, a group of World Civilizations faculty gathered to transform the World Civilizations Covenant into a set of student-centered rather than instructor-centered assessable learning objectives. The words "teach basic information retrieval and library research skills" were changed to "[students will] demonstrate basic information retrieval and library research skills." In addition, this new phrasing was amended to say that students will be able to "construct and defend a thesis, evaluate sources, and use scholarly reference books as a starting point for information retrieval and evaluation." Concentration on theses and evaluation of sources evokes observation of some interesting trends across the World Civilizations library assignments.||23|
|Developing a thesis from a research question is a fundamental component in most academic writing. Four of the twenty-four library assignments analyzed asked students to somehow develop a thesis. The advantage of this kind of library assignment is that students are required to process the totality of the information gathered in light of a research thesis or question. Students cannot simply gather information on a topic and drop it into a paper. The disadvantage, as was learned from the comments of many World Civilizations professors, is that students rarely can develop a sophisticated thesis. Instead, they craft broad thesis statements that lack depth and are easy to prove by simply utilizing what one instructor called "an encyclopedic data dump." To confront this problem one instructor places students in a historical scenario where they must make controversial decisions and justify them. Another has students select from a professor-generated set of thesis statements. Other teachers have students analyze a model student paper which illustrates how the thesis statement drives all of the paper's content. Yet perhaps college freshmen should not be expected to develop sophisticated theses. After all, most professors do not even ask them to try to tackle reading the historical journal articles that provide models for such writing. Nevertheless, one professor reports that when students do research well, they get a real sense of accomplishment and discovery.||24|
Resource evaluation is a part of sixteen of the twenty-four library assignments and takes one of two forms. The first involves comparing each resource to a set of criteria provided by the instructor. The criteria typically include issues such as author credentials, publisher reputation, quality layout and structure of the resource, presence of a well-developed thesis with evidence to support it, and inclusion of bibliographic entries. The second type of resource evaluation scheme involves the students comparing like resources (e.g., one book to another) in terms of their authorship, accuracy, objectivity and comprehensiveness. These two kinds of resource evaluation often take the form of annotated bibliographies. The advantage of annotated bibliographies is that they provide a structured format, one entry per resource item, and, by definition, they require students to not only give a concise summary of the work's main points but to provide evaluative statements about the resource. The disadvantage is the lack of a way to assimilate the information gathered to answer an overarching research question. It is interesting to note that several library assignments ask students to gather resources and then decide if each resource was helpful. It seems difficult to judge a source as helpful or unhelpful in cases where the only context for making a judgment is general topic relevance rather than a research question. Instructors are increasingly challenging their students to engage in higher order thinking such as evaluation, so it is important to provide context and structure for making evaluations. WSU librarians have created several handouts to assist instructors and students in this process.9
|From conversations with World Civilizations instructors and from examining their library assignments, it is clear that there are differing philosophies about many assignment facets. There are divergent opinions about whether or not to incorporate creative writing elements into the assignment, what kinds of library materials are appropriate for research at the college freshman level, whether or not utilization of Websites is acceptable, and citation requirements. Conversely, there are many common themes that together give the library assignment a programmatic cohesiveness. All of the assignments require students to use WSU Libraries' resources to do their research. There is also a ubiquitous sense that the evaluation of sources is a central component of the assignment and that the process of gathering library resources in a variety of information formats is a beneficial endeavor. Every instructor that had been with the program for more than a couple of years stated that plagiarism concerns have served as a catalyst for altering their library assignment's structure. The library assignment will continue to be an integral and successful component of the program, in large part because its instructors are committed to developing assignments that meet the changing environment of library research. We feel the insights and experiences of WSU faculty will be useful for world history instructors at all levels.||26|
Biographical Note: Corey Johnson is an Instructional Design Librarian at Washington State University. Alice Spitzer is a Reference Librarian and World Civilizations instructor at Washington State University.
4 Corey Johnson, "Creating Effective Library Assignments,"
http://www.wsulibs.wsu.edu/usered/eff_lib_assigns.html (accessed 17 March 2005).
7 Alice Spitzer, Paula Elliot, "World Civilizations Selected Encyclopedias in Holland Library," http://www.systems.wsu.edu/bin/libdocs/subject/World_civ_encyc.pdf (accessed 4 November 2004).
9 The three resource evaluation guides are: Evaluating Information Sources: How Do You Know If They Are Good? http://www.systems.wsu.edu/bin/libdocs/instruction/source_evaluation.pdf (accessed 18 November 2004); Evaluating Information Sources Worksheet http://www.systems.wsu.edu/bin/libdocs/instruction/source_evaluation_worksheet.pdf (accessed 18 November 2004); Evaluating Web Sites http://www.systems.wsu.edu/bin/libdocs/instruction/web_evaluation.pdf (accessed 18 November 2004).
|Home | List Journal Issues | Table of Contents|
|© 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois|